Comparison Guide
Fractional CGO vs Growth Agency
Embedded operator vs. external vendor: which model drives better outcomes for your company?
Fractional CGO
Embedded Operator
- Part of your team, in your systems
- P&L accountability and ownership
- Builds infrastructure you keep
- Direct access, no account managers
- Aligned with your outcomes
Growth Agency
External Vendor
- Outside your org, separate systems
- Deliverable-focused, not outcome-focused
- Work product they retain expertise on
- Account manager layer between you and work
- Aligned with retainer renewal
When Agencies Make Sense
Agencies are the right choice when you need specialized execution capacity for defined-scope work.
Specialized Execution Capacity
You need hands to execute a defined playbook — paid media buying, content production at scale, or design work that exceeds your team's bandwidth.
Specific Channel Expertise
You need deep expertise in a channel you don't want to build in-house — TikTok ads, influencer management, or PR.
Creative Production
You need high-volume creative assets — video production, brand campaigns, or design systems that require a full creative team.
Defined Scope Projects
You have a clear brief, defined deliverables, and don't need strategic input — just execution against a spec.
When Fractional CGO Makes Sense
A fractional CGO is the right choice when you need strategic ownership, not just execution.
Strategic Ownership
You need someone who owns the growth function, not just executes tasks. Someone accountable for revenue outcomes, not deliverables.
Systems Building
You need infrastructure that compounds — churn recovery automation, billing systems, SEO at scale — not campaigns that end when the retainer does.
Operational Diagnosis
You're not sure what's broken. You need someone to diagnose the real problems before prescribing solutions — not an agency selling their services.
P&L Accountability
You need someone who thinks about margin, efficiency, and revenue — not just top-of-funnel metrics that look good in reports.
Speed Without Bureaucracy
You need things built this week, not a 6-week kickoff process with strategy decks and stakeholder alignment meetings.
Cost Comparison
Beyond the monthly retainer: understanding the total cost of ownership.
| Category | Growth Agency | Fractional CGO |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly Investment | $15K-50K/month retainer | $10K-25K/month engagement |
| What You Get | Defined deliverables, hours allocated | Outcomes and ownership, flexible scope |
| Hidden Costs | Overage fees, scope change costs, tool markups | None — systems built become yours |
| Exit Cost | Knowledge walks out, dependency remains | Infrastructure stays, team is trained |
| Time Investment | Weekly calls, feedback cycles, approvals | Embedded in team, minimal overhead |
Speed to Impact
Weekend builds vs. agency timelines. How fast can you expect results?
Agency Timeline
- Kickoff & Discovery2-4 weeks
- Strategy Development2-3 weeks
- Creative Production3-4 weeks
- Launch & OptimizationOngoing
- Total to First Results8-12 weeks
Fractional CGO Timeline
- Diagnostic & AuditWeek 1
- Quick Wins ShippedWeek 2
- Core Systems BuiltWeeks 3-4
- Optimization & HandoffOngoing
- Total to First Results1-2 weeks
The Hybrid Approach
The most effective model: a fractional CGO directing specialized agencies. You get strategic ownership AND execution capacity.
Strategic Layer
CGO owns strategy, holds agencies accountable to outcomes not deliverables
Execution Layer
Agencies provide specialized capacity the CGO directs and optimizes
No Vendor Lock-in
CGO can swap agencies without losing institutional knowledge
Cost Efficiency
Pay for agency execution only where it makes sense, build internally where it doesn't
Red Flags to Watch For
Warning signs that indicate you might be making the wrong choice.
Agency Red Flags
They can't explain their strategy
If the account manager can't articulate why they're recommending specific tactics, you're paying for a playbook, not thinking.
Metrics without context
Reporting impressions and clicks without connecting to revenue is a sign they're optimizing for renewals, not your outcomes.
Long contracts, vague deliverables
6-12 month minimums with 'strategic support' in the SOW usually means they're locking you in before proving value.
Resistance to transparency
If you can't see inside their process, access their tools, or talk to the people doing the work — you're a number, not a partner.
Fractional Red Flags
No operational experience
If they've only consulted and never built, they'll give you advice but not execution. Ask for examples of systems they've shipped.
Can't show P&L impact
Vague outcomes like 'improved processes' or 'better alignment' without revenue numbers means they're selling time, not results.
Too many clients
If they're juggling 10+ engagements, you're not getting embedded — you're getting a consultant who shows up for calls.
Strategy-only positioning
If they emphasize 'advisory' over 'operator,' they're a consultant in fractional clothing. You want someone who builds.
Not sure which model is right for you? Let's talk through your situation.